custom-designed sensititre® ast plates Search Results


90
Visiopharm AS visiopharm 2020.09.0.8195
Visiopharm 2020.09.0.8195, supplied by Visiopharm AS, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/pm39976232-76-9-5?v=Visiopharm+AS
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
visiopharm 2020.09.0.8195 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RStudio custom-designed scripts
Custom Designed Scripts, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/pm40588520-374-28-31?v=RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom-designed scripts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
alan scientific custom designed peptide
Custom Designed Peptide, supplied by alan scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/pmc09898191-568-1-7?v=alan+scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom designed peptide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Luxel Corporation of aluminum film mounting on five lines per inch nickel mesh in custom-designed frames
Of Aluminum Film Mounting On Five Lines Per Inch Nickel Mesh In Custom Designed Frames, supplied by Luxel Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/10__1007_slash_s11207___019___1551___2-124-17-21?v=Luxel+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
of aluminum film mounting on five lines per inch nickel mesh in custom-designed frames - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Hybex Innovations mr-compatible jointed arm
Mr Compatible Jointed Arm, supplied by Hybex Innovations, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/10__1523_slash_jneurosci__2333___15__2015-90-1-5?v=Hybex+Innovations
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mr-compatible jointed arm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
POWERLAB INC custom-designed interface unit
Custom Designed Interface Unit, supplied by POWERLAB INC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/pm17717115-83-1-27?v=POWERLAB+INC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom-designed interface unit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biomatik polypeptides
Model <t>peptides</t> can be fingerprinted with FRET X (A) Depiction of the experimental system for peptide fingerprinting. The target peptide is immobilized through conjugation of its N-terminal biotin with the streptavidin on the PEGylated surface. The donor (Cy3)-labeled imager strand (yellow) can bind to the DNA-docking site on the cysteine, while the acceptor (Cy5)-labeled imager strand (red) can hybridize to the docking site on the lysine. Simultaneous binding generates short FRET events and is observed with total internal reflection microscopy. (B) Representative kymograph for a peptide with a cysteine that is 10 amino acids separated from the acceptor-binding site. The FRET efficiency for each data point in a binding event (lines) and the mean FRET efficiency from all data points in a binding event (dots) are indicated as a function of time. A Gaussian distribution (0.88 ± 0.14) is fitted on a histogram of average FRET efficiencies per FRET event. The means of the Gaussians are plotted in a separate panel (bottom) and are referred to as the FRET X fingerprint of the peptide. The FRET population on the left is caused by donor leakage into the acceptor channel. (C) Our four model peptides have a lysine at the N terminus and a cysteine at position 10, 20, 30 or 40. See for the full amino acid sequences of the model peptides. (D) Experimental distributions and fingerprints for each peptide show a downward trend in mean FRET ( E ) for increasing FRET pair separation (mean ± FWHM of the Gaussian fit: 0.89 ± 0.14, 0.75 ± 0.20, 0.72 ± 0.11, 0.57 ± 0.20). See also and for imager strand dwell times and kymographs for single peptides, respectively. (E) The simulated distributions and fingerprints for the four peptides show a similar downward trend in distribution means (0.82 ± 0.08, 0.76 ± 0.15, 0.68 ± 0.20, 0.62 ± 0.23). (F) Experimental and simulated data correlate well. Whiskers denote ± one standard deviation. Standard deviation of experimental data points is over four kymographs (each consisting of hundreds of events). Experiments were performed on separate days.
Polypeptides, supplied by Biomatik, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/pmc08546410-213-0-6?v=Biomatik
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polypeptides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
PrimerDesign Inc custom designed primers for quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rt-pcr)
Model <t>peptides</t> can be fingerprinted with FRET X (A) Depiction of the experimental system for peptide fingerprinting. The target peptide is immobilized through conjugation of its N-terminal biotin with the streptavidin on the PEGylated surface. The donor (Cy3)-labeled imager strand (yellow) can bind to the DNA-docking site on the cysteine, while the acceptor (Cy5)-labeled imager strand (red) can hybridize to the docking site on the lysine. Simultaneous binding generates short FRET events and is observed with total internal reflection microscopy. (B) Representative kymograph for a peptide with a cysteine that is 10 amino acids separated from the acceptor-binding site. The FRET efficiency for each data point in a binding event (lines) and the mean FRET efficiency from all data points in a binding event (dots) are indicated as a function of time. A Gaussian distribution (0.88 ± 0.14) is fitted on a histogram of average FRET efficiencies per FRET event. The means of the Gaussians are plotted in a separate panel (bottom) and are referred to as the FRET X fingerprint of the peptide. The FRET population on the left is caused by donor leakage into the acceptor channel. (C) Our four model peptides have a lysine at the N terminus and a cysteine at position 10, 20, 30 or 40. See for the full amino acid sequences of the model peptides. (D) Experimental distributions and fingerprints for each peptide show a downward trend in mean FRET ( E ) for increasing FRET pair separation (mean ± FWHM of the Gaussian fit: 0.89 ± 0.14, 0.75 ± 0.20, 0.72 ± 0.11, 0.57 ± 0.20). See also and for imager strand dwell times and kymographs for single peptides, respectively. (E) The simulated distributions and fingerprints for the four peptides show a similar downward trend in distribution means (0.82 ± 0.08, 0.76 ± 0.15, 0.68 ± 0.20, 0.62 ± 0.23). (F) Experimental and simulated data correlate well. Whiskers denote ± one standard deviation. Standard deviation of experimental data points is over four kymographs (each consisting of hundreds of events). Experiments were performed on separate days.
Custom Designed Primers For Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (Rt Pcr), supplied by PrimerDesign Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/pmc04014078-61-14-28?v=PrimerDesign+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom designed primers for quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rt-pcr) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Sangon Biotech custom designed primers
Model <t>peptides</t> can be fingerprinted with FRET X (A) Depiction of the experimental system for peptide fingerprinting. The target peptide is immobilized through conjugation of its N-terminal biotin with the streptavidin on the PEGylated surface. The donor (Cy3)-labeled imager strand (yellow) can bind to the DNA-docking site on the cysteine, while the acceptor (Cy5)-labeled imager strand (red) can hybridize to the docking site on the lysine. Simultaneous binding generates short FRET events and is observed with total internal reflection microscopy. (B) Representative kymograph for a peptide with a cysteine that is 10 amino acids separated from the acceptor-binding site. The FRET efficiency for each data point in a binding event (lines) and the mean FRET efficiency from all data points in a binding event (dots) are indicated as a function of time. A Gaussian distribution (0.88 ± 0.14) is fitted on a histogram of average FRET efficiencies per FRET event. The means of the Gaussians are plotted in a separate panel (bottom) and are referred to as the FRET X fingerprint of the peptide. The FRET population on the left is caused by donor leakage into the acceptor channel. (C) Our four model peptides have a lysine at the N terminus and a cysteine at position 10, 20, 30 or 40. See for the full amino acid sequences of the model peptides. (D) Experimental distributions and fingerprints for each peptide show a downward trend in mean FRET ( E ) for increasing FRET pair separation (mean ± FWHM of the Gaussian fit: 0.89 ± 0.14, 0.75 ± 0.20, 0.72 ± 0.11, 0.57 ± 0.20). See also and for imager strand dwell times and kymographs for single peptides, respectively. (E) The simulated distributions and fingerprints for the four peptides show a similar downward trend in distribution means (0.82 ± 0.08, 0.76 ± 0.15, 0.68 ± 0.20, 0.62 ± 0.23). (F) Experimental and simulated data correlate well. Whiskers denote ± one standard deviation. Standard deviation of experimental data points is over four kymographs (each consisting of hundreds of events). Experiments were performed on separate days.
Custom Designed Primers, supplied by Sangon Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/pm41152825-105-0-7?v=Sangon+Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom designed primers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RStudio custom-designed application
Model <t>peptides</t> can be fingerprinted with FRET X (A) Depiction of the experimental system for peptide fingerprinting. The target peptide is immobilized through conjugation of its N-terminal biotin with the streptavidin on the PEGylated surface. The donor (Cy3)-labeled imager strand (yellow) can bind to the DNA-docking site on the cysteine, while the acceptor (Cy5)-labeled imager strand (red) can hybridize to the docking site on the lysine. Simultaneous binding generates short FRET events and is observed with total internal reflection microscopy. (B) Representative kymograph for a peptide with a cysteine that is 10 amino acids separated from the acceptor-binding site. The FRET efficiency for each data point in a binding event (lines) and the mean FRET efficiency from all data points in a binding event (dots) are indicated as a function of time. A Gaussian distribution (0.88 ± 0.14) is fitted on a histogram of average FRET efficiencies per FRET event. The means of the Gaussians are plotted in a separate panel (bottom) and are referred to as the FRET X fingerprint of the peptide. The FRET population on the left is caused by donor leakage into the acceptor channel. (C) Our four model peptides have a lysine at the N terminus and a cysteine at position 10, 20, 30 or 40. See for the full amino acid sequences of the model peptides. (D) Experimental distributions and fingerprints for each peptide show a downward trend in mean FRET ( E ) for increasing FRET pair separation (mean ± FWHM of the Gaussian fit: 0.89 ± 0.14, 0.75 ± 0.20, 0.72 ± 0.11, 0.57 ± 0.20). See also and for imager strand dwell times and kymographs for single peptides, respectively. (E) The simulated distributions and fingerprints for the four peptides show a similar downward trend in distribution means (0.82 ± 0.08, 0.76 ± 0.15, 0.68 ± 0.20, 0.62 ± 0.23). (F) Experimental and simulated data correlate well. Whiskers denote ± one standard deviation. Standard deviation of experimental data points is over four kymographs (each consisting of hundreds of events). Experiments were performed on separate days.
Custom Designed Application, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/pmc08241714-129-25-28?v=RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom-designed application - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
apple inc browser-based cross-platform software tool tadimus
Model <t>peptides</t> can be fingerprinted with FRET X (A) Depiction of the experimental system for peptide fingerprinting. The target peptide is immobilized through conjugation of its N-terminal biotin with the streptavidin on the PEGylated surface. The donor (Cy3)-labeled imager strand (yellow) can bind to the DNA-docking site on the cysteine, while the acceptor (Cy5)-labeled imager strand (red) can hybridize to the docking site on the lysine. Simultaneous binding generates short FRET events and is observed with total internal reflection microscopy. (B) Representative kymograph for a peptide with a cysteine that is 10 amino acids separated from the acceptor-binding site. The FRET efficiency for each data point in a binding event (lines) and the mean FRET efficiency from all data points in a binding event (dots) are indicated as a function of time. A Gaussian distribution (0.88 ± 0.14) is fitted on a histogram of average FRET efficiencies per FRET event. The means of the Gaussians are plotted in a separate panel (bottom) and are referred to as the FRET X fingerprint of the peptide. The FRET population on the left is caused by donor leakage into the acceptor channel. (C) Our four model peptides have a lysine at the N terminus and a cysteine at position 10, 20, 30 or 40. See for the full amino acid sequences of the model peptides. (D) Experimental distributions and fingerprints for each peptide show a downward trend in mean FRET ( E ) for increasing FRET pair separation (mean ± FWHM of the Gaussian fit: 0.89 ± 0.14, 0.75 ± 0.20, 0.72 ± 0.11, 0.57 ± 0.20). See also and for imager strand dwell times and kymographs for single peptides, respectively. (E) The simulated distributions and fingerprints for the four peptides show a similar downward trend in distribution means (0.82 ± 0.08, 0.76 ± 0.15, 0.68 ± 0.20, 0.62 ± 0.23). (F) Experimental and simulated data correlate well. Whiskers denote ± one standard deviation. Standard deviation of experimental data points is over four kymographs (each consisting of hundreds of events). Experiments were performed on separate days.
Browser Based Cross Platform Software Tool Tadimus, supplied by apple inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/pmc04479527-56-1-32?v=apple+inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
browser-based cross-platform software tool tadimus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biomatik custom designed polypeptides
Model <t>peptides</t> can be fingerprinted with FRET X (A) Depiction of the experimental system for peptide fingerprinting. The target peptide is immobilized through conjugation of its N-terminal biotin with the streptavidin on the PEGylated surface. The donor (Cy3)-labeled imager strand (yellow) can bind to the DNA-docking site on the cysteine, while the acceptor (Cy5)-labeled imager strand (red) can hybridize to the docking site on the lysine. Simultaneous binding generates short FRET events and is observed with total internal reflection microscopy. (B) Representative kymograph for a peptide with a cysteine that is 10 amino acids separated from the acceptor-binding site. The FRET efficiency for each data point in a binding event (lines) and the mean FRET efficiency from all data points in a binding event (dots) are indicated as a function of time. A Gaussian distribution (0.88 ± 0.14) is fitted on a histogram of average FRET efficiencies per FRET event. The means of the Gaussians are plotted in a separate panel (bottom) and are referred to as the FRET X fingerprint of the peptide. The FRET population on the left is caused by donor leakage into the acceptor channel. (C) Our four model peptides have a lysine at the N terminus and a cysteine at position 10, 20, 30 or 40. See for the full amino acid sequences of the model peptides. (D) Experimental distributions and fingerprints for each peptide show a downward trend in mean FRET ( E ) for increasing FRET pair separation (mean ± FWHM of the Gaussian fit: 0.89 ± 0.14, 0.75 ± 0.20, 0.72 ± 0.11, 0.57 ± 0.20). See also and for imager strand dwell times and kymographs for single peptides, respectively. (E) The simulated distributions and fingerprints for the four peptides show a similar downward trend in distribution means (0.82 ± 0.08, 0.76 ± 0.15, 0.68 ± 0.20, 0.62 ± 0.23). (F) Experimental and simulated data correlate well. Whiskers denote ± one standard deviation. Standard deviation of experimental data points is over four kymographs (each consisting of hundreds of events). Experiments were performed on separate days.
Custom Designed Polypeptides, supplied by Biomatik, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom-designed+sensititre%C2%AE+ast+plates/10__2139_slash_ssrn__3881353-165-0-6?v=Biomatik
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom designed polypeptides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Model peptides can be fingerprinted with FRET X (A) Depiction of the experimental system for peptide fingerprinting. The target peptide is immobilized through conjugation of its N-terminal biotin with the streptavidin on the PEGylated surface. The donor (Cy3)-labeled imager strand (yellow) can bind to the DNA-docking site on the cysteine, while the acceptor (Cy5)-labeled imager strand (red) can hybridize to the docking site on the lysine. Simultaneous binding generates short FRET events and is observed with total internal reflection microscopy. (B) Representative kymograph for a peptide with a cysteine that is 10 amino acids separated from the acceptor-binding site. The FRET efficiency for each data point in a binding event (lines) and the mean FRET efficiency from all data points in a binding event (dots) are indicated as a function of time. A Gaussian distribution (0.88 ± 0.14) is fitted on a histogram of average FRET efficiencies per FRET event. The means of the Gaussians are plotted in a separate panel (bottom) and are referred to as the FRET X fingerprint of the peptide. The FRET population on the left is caused by donor leakage into the acceptor channel. (C) Our four model peptides have a lysine at the N terminus and a cysteine at position 10, 20, 30 or 40. See for the full amino acid sequences of the model peptides. (D) Experimental distributions and fingerprints for each peptide show a downward trend in mean FRET ( E ) for increasing FRET pair separation (mean ± FWHM of the Gaussian fit: 0.89 ± 0.14, 0.75 ± 0.20, 0.72 ± 0.11, 0.57 ± 0.20). See also and for imager strand dwell times and kymographs for single peptides, respectively. (E) The simulated distributions and fingerprints for the four peptides show a similar downward trend in distribution means (0.82 ± 0.08, 0.76 ± 0.15, 0.68 ± 0.20, 0.62 ± 0.23). (F) Experimental and simulated data correlate well. Whiskers denote ± one standard deviation. Standard deviation of experimental data points is over four kymographs (each consisting of hundreds of events). Experiments were performed on separate days.

Journal: iScience

Article Title: Evaluation of FRET X for single-molecule protein fingerprinting

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103239

Figure Lengend Snippet: Model peptides can be fingerprinted with FRET X (A) Depiction of the experimental system for peptide fingerprinting. The target peptide is immobilized through conjugation of its N-terminal biotin with the streptavidin on the PEGylated surface. The donor (Cy3)-labeled imager strand (yellow) can bind to the DNA-docking site on the cysteine, while the acceptor (Cy5)-labeled imager strand (red) can hybridize to the docking site on the lysine. Simultaneous binding generates short FRET events and is observed with total internal reflection microscopy. (B) Representative kymograph for a peptide with a cysteine that is 10 amino acids separated from the acceptor-binding site. The FRET efficiency for each data point in a binding event (lines) and the mean FRET efficiency from all data points in a binding event (dots) are indicated as a function of time. A Gaussian distribution (0.88 ± 0.14) is fitted on a histogram of average FRET efficiencies per FRET event. The means of the Gaussians are plotted in a separate panel (bottom) and are referred to as the FRET X fingerprint of the peptide. The FRET population on the left is caused by donor leakage into the acceptor channel. (C) Our four model peptides have a lysine at the N terminus and a cysteine at position 10, 20, 30 or 40. See for the full amino acid sequences of the model peptides. (D) Experimental distributions and fingerprints for each peptide show a downward trend in mean FRET ( E ) for increasing FRET pair separation (mean ± FWHM of the Gaussian fit: 0.89 ± 0.14, 0.75 ± 0.20, 0.72 ± 0.11, 0.57 ± 0.20). See also and for imager strand dwell times and kymographs for single peptides, respectively. (E) The simulated distributions and fingerprints for the four peptides show a similar downward trend in distribution means (0.82 ± 0.08, 0.76 ± 0.15, 0.68 ± 0.20, 0.62 ± 0.23). (F) Experimental and simulated data correlate well. Whiskers denote ± one standard deviation. Standard deviation of experimental data points is over four kymographs (each consisting of hundreds of events). Experiments were performed on separate days.

Article Snippet: Custom designed polypeptides were obtained from Biomatik (Canada) and had a constant backbone sequence , differing only in the cysteine substitutions.

Techniques: Conjugation Assay, Labeling, Binding Assay, Microscopy, Standard Deviation